Self-Paced Professional Training
12 Hours | 12 CEs | CEU | CPD |
Distance Learning Home Study Program
This self-paced online training program is presented by Dr. Itiel Dror and focuses on Minimizing bias in Forensic Decision Making. The program covers brain and cognitive issues relating to bias and cognitive processing, and then connects the cognitive science issues to practical and specific issues in forensic decision making. In addition to knowledge about the cognitive factors in forensic decision making, the program also provides practical solutions to address weaknesses as well as best practices to enhance forensic practices.
Specific application to forensic mental health evaluation is provided through engaging discussions between Dr. Dror and Dr. Patricia Zapf, a forensic psychologist and expert in best practices in forensic mental health evaluation. In addition, Dr. Zapf provides elaboration on how the factors discussed by Dr. Dror are applicable to forensic mental health evaluation.
This program is directly relevant to the document recently adopted by the National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS). The practical implementation of this document (“Ensuring That Forensic Analysis Is Based Upon Task-Relevant Information”) is presented and discussed, as are the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences report on forensic science.
Conducting forensic examinations is similar to other expert domains that require perception and interpretation of information, such as in the military, medical, and financial domains. Even in everyday life humans constantly process information. Information is perceived, encoded, represented, transformed, stored, retrieved, compared to other information, evaluated and assessed, to name just a few cognitive processes. The human mind is not a camera, as we actively process and compare information. It is naive to think that we passively construct and experience reality, and perceive the environment as ‘it really is’.
We engage in a variety of cognitive processes that organize and structure the information as it comes in from the external world. Information is then further interpreted and processed in ways that highly depend on the human mind and cognitive factors. As we dynamically process information, we affect what we see, how we interpret and evaluate it, and our decision making process. Thus, to enhance expert performance and understand that different factors may affect their work, especially in a highly specialized domain such as forensics, one needs to take into account the role of the human mind and cognitive factors (Dror, 2015).
Although training is provided to forensic experts, there is a lack of training in psychological and cognitive elements involved in forensic decision making. Thus, there is a lack of systematic training and professional development in the influence of human cognition on forensic work and this workshop is a step towards addressing training in the cognitive factors involved in forensic decision making.
This training program is aimed at forensic evaluators, including psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, counselors, and other mental health professionals who engage in evaluations where decisions and opinions are required for a forensic context. This training program is appropriate for beginner, intermediate, and advanced level clinicians.
NOTE: If you are a forensic scientist in any domain (e.g., fingerprint, DNA, bite marks, fire investigation, etc) please see the training program at this link.
Minimizing Bias in Forensic Decision Making
Learning Objectives: Upon completion of this course, participants should be able to:
- Describe background information regarding the human mind and cognitive system
- Describe how information and knowledge is acquired, processed, represented, encoded, stored, utilized, retrieved, compared, and evaluated
- Describe how decisions are made
- Demonstrate the connection between information and a variety of forensic decision making processes that forensic examiners typically use
- Describe how cognitive factors can be utilized to make forensic experts' work more efficient
- Describe the pitfalls and errors that can occur in forensic decision making
- Describe the Factors / Powers that influence the mind of the forensic evaluator
- Describe the Dror HEP Hierarchy of Expert Performance
- Describe sources of bias and countermeasures
- Describe the process of Chunking
12 Hours | 12 CE (CEU) Credits | $400
Here's What People are Saying...
"The training helped me to better understand the issues of cognitive bias and how they relate to my work. I feel I am better prepared to address these issues when they come up in court."-Forensic Psychologist
"Very eye opening training to biases that we may be unaware of. The thing I took away most was that even though you may be exposed to various biases, if the methods are followed and precautions taken, the science can still be correct."–Social Work Intern
"I was very impressed with the training. It is very important for forensic practitioners to understand how the brain works and how bias can affect our analysis. Thank you."–Clinical Psychologist
About our Presenters
About Dr. Itiel Dror
Over the last decade Dr. Dror has worked with a variety of forensic laboratories across the US, in which he has visited and shadowed examiners doing casework, reviewed SOPs and practices. Dr. Dror was the Chair of the OSAC Human Factor group (the new ‘SWGs’ organized under NIST/NIJ), which is responsible for the cognitive factor issues across all the OSAC forensic domains. The National Commission on Forensic Science has recognized Dr. Dror as the leader in this area and has asked him to present to the commission (as well as appointed him to their Human Factors subcommittee), as well as many other forensic bodies who have solicited Dr. Dror. The recommendations on cognitive and human factors of the NCFS and the NAS report, and other bodies is mainly based on the research of Dr. Dror. He is also a member of the AAAS (The American Association for the Advancement of Science) Advisory Committee on Forensic Science Assessment (a project in which the AAAS will conduct an analysis of the underlying scientific bases for the forensic tools and methods currently used).
As the world leader in this area, Dr. Dror has also been commissioned to deliver this workshop in a variety of countries across the world (Australia, Finland, the Netherlands, Italy, Canada, as well as other countries –not to mention numerous police forces the UK). The success of his workshops and his training in this area has been recognized by the professional bodies: Dr. Dror has received the ABP Annual Award for 'Excellence in Training' for his workshops on cognitive factors in making forensic comparisons. The purpose of the award is to recognize excellence in demonstrating how applying an understanding of the science of human behaviour can impact and deliver practical value to organizations. The judges commented that Dr. Dror's workshops are: "Truly outstanding and inspiring", "A highly rigorous application of relevant theoretical frameworks", "Truly innovative, breaking entirely new ground in a most challenging context", "Internationally ground-breaking impact already being used around the world", "Entirely focused on application of conceptual models – underpinned by deep research", and "Impact is highly impressive".
Your satisfaction with your Programs, Products or Services is important to us. However, because upon registration and payment for our Programs, Products, and Services, they are promptly made available to you, we do not issue refunds. Should you find that a particular Program, Product or Service is not the right fit for you, we will gladly assist you and provide access to another of our currently offered Programs, Products or Services of an equal price that might better suit you, provided that you contact us through our Website contact form or send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org explaining why you seek a substitute Program, Product or Service.
For in-person workshops we offer a 50% refund up until 2 weeks out from the start date of each workshop. There are no refunds within 2 weeks but will accommodate with access to the online program.
If you would like to file a grievance, go to www.ConCEPT-ce.com and read our Grievance Policy. Then, you can file a grievance on our Contact page. You can also send a written grievance to:
Consolidated Continuing Education & Professional Training (CONCEPT)
5668 FishHawk Crossing Blvd, #306 Lithia, FL 33547
Continuing Education Credit
Click here for state and other regional board approvals.
No prior knowledge in cognition is required. This program covers a variety of issues specifically chosen as relevant to enhance the work of forensic evaluators. Three primary areas are covered: 1. Background knowledge, 2. Domain applications, and 3. Domain implications.
Background knowledge will cover general principles and mechanisms of the human mind and cognition as they relate to bias. These issues include:
a. The human brain and how that translates to human performance and how we process information.
b. How information processing underlies all aspects of perception and cognition in general and in expertise.
c. Specific issues in information processing, such as: Knowledge representation, Allocation of resources, Perception, Judgement and Decision making.
d. Architectural constraints in cognition, including: Limits in information processing load, Malfunctions, and Lack of control.
Domain Implications will tie both Background Knowledge and Domain Applications to specific issues regarding how forensic decision making is conducted.
In addition to specific ways to enhance forensic decision making, this course will try to provide more in depth tools to the participants. Such tools will accompany the participants in the future and will enable them to enhance and enrich their professional abilities. This part will also include discussion of court cases that were challenging and highlighted cognitive factors in forensic decision making. The recent National Commission on Forensic Science’s document on “Ensuring That Forensic Analysis Is Based Upon Task Relevant Information” and other recent developments in OSAC, NIST, and DoJ will be discussed and integrated into the course. In addition, Dr. Patricia Zapf provides commentary and discussion of how these principles apply to forensic mental health evaluation.
Domain Applications will connect the Background Knowledge to a variety of forensic decision making issues, which will include:
a. Cognitive perseverance
b. Confirmation bias
c. Self-fulfilling prophecies
d. Contextual influences
e. Cognitive closure
g. Escalation of commitment
h. Cognitive dissonance